July 8, 2026

The Right Withdrawal Rate?

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player icon

Tom and Don tackle one of retirement’s hardest questions: how much can you safely spend from your portfolio without blowing up the rest of your life? They walk through the familiar 4% rule, flexible withdrawal strategies, why a flat 10% withdrawal is usually fantasyland, and why the “right” spending rate depends heavily on your age, timeline, and tolerance for adjusting in bad markets. They also answer a listener question about a 22-year-old’s investment allocation and close with a timely discussion of the latest Social Security trust fund warning, what it actually means, and the only real ways Congress can fix it.

00:12 — How much can you safely spend in retirement? Tom and Don tee up the big question: 4% rule, 5% flexible rule, or something more personalized.
02:08 — Survey shocker: many people think they need 30 years of income saved before retiring comfortably.
03:03 — Longevity math: how long retirement might actually last, and why that matters for withdrawal rates.
04:40 — Can you really withdraw 10% a year? Tom and Don push back on overly aggressive retirement spending assumptions.
05:59 — Why generic withdrawal rules fall apart in real-life retirement planning.
06:25 — Every retiree needs a personalized withdrawal strategy based on their own timeline and circumstances.
07:17 — Retiring at 60 vs. 70: why earlier retirement makes even “safe” withdrawal rates riskier.
09:04 — Why it’s worth having a professional review your retirement withdrawal plan, even if you’ve used calculators.
09:58 — The case for flexible withdrawals: spending more in strong markets and less in weak ones.
10:20 — Three common retirement planning mistakes: not saving enough, not knowing your needed return, and taking the wrong amount of risk.
12:16 — Listener question: a 22-year-old with $28,500 invested wants to know if his allocation makes sense.
13:28 — Breaking down DFAW, VT, and VTI: overlap, diversification, and whether the portfolio is too complicated.
16:21 — The bigger story: a 22-year-old already has a terrific head start on retirement savings.
17:56 — Social Security update: the trust fund could run short in 2032 if nothing changes.
18:37 — The only real ways to fix Social Security: raise taxes, cut benefits, or some combination of both.
19:52 — Why scary Social Security headlines should not automatically push people to file early.
21:22 — One possible fix: raising or removing the payroll tax cap.
23:27 — The demographic problem under Social Security: too few workers supporting too many retirees.

Questions? Comments? Click!

00:11 - Retirement Spending Rules

03:48 - Withdrawal Rates Matter

07:17 - Age Changes the Plan

09:07 - Get Personalized Advice

10:23 - Flexible Withdrawals Work

12:09 - Young Investor Portfolio

18:00 - Social Security Crunch

25:25 - Questions and Help

SPEAKER_02

You're gonna do a really great financial feature. Tom and Don are talking real

Retirement Spending Rules

SPEAKER_02

money.

SPEAKER_01

Many of you, particularly those of you who listen to Talking Real Money, are exemplary savers and sometimes actually even decent investors, although sometimes not. So here's the question. When you get to retirement and you want to start living off of your assets, how much money should you spend? Should you stick with the 4% rule or the 5% flexible rule? Or are there times when you can go a little crazy? Do a little more. Get down tonight? No, no, I'm sorry. I'm sorry, I was got the wedding thing again. Uh hi everybody. Don here at uh the Talking Real Money Florida headquarters. Tom there in the Model Military Aircraft Museum in beautiful Duval, Washington, where uh the tourists are lining up for the uh the the weekend opening when they can all get to come in and stare at the planes.

SPEAKER_00

Dan Hutt. We're ready, sir.

SPEAKER_01

Ticket prices are are rising, so you might want to get your tickets soon.

SPEAKER_00

Or as we like to say here, let the bombing begin. So there's a lot of people.

SPEAKER_01

Because remember, we want you to help Tom be able to spend even more money on vacation and retirement. And so uh how much should you spend? That's really a big question. Some people say less than four percent, some people say four, some people say five, some people say no, you're not spending enough. What's the right answer? Yeah, there is no right answer. So thanks a lot, then never mind.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and you know, I mean, all joking aside, I spent I don't like it. I spending too much money right now. Every day I look at the bills. No, don't no, no, no, oh, okay, they already spent that, can't stop it. But interesting survey from the principal financial group where they asked uh private sector companies about how much they asked people, how much do you think you need saved? Now, 56%, that's almost six out of ten, think they need 30 years of income saved before they can retire comfortably.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, stop there. That's a big number. That's wait. So hold on. That's really an optimistic number.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, it really is.

SPEAKER_01

You're gonna live a long time. Let's see. Let's say retirement is well, it used to be 65, but I guess we should say 67 now.

SPEAKER_00

Well, no, there's some in politics who say it's gonna be 69. Okay, but that's right. Now that's later, maybe. But no, I think if you looked at the average still is about 65. I think that's we looked that up not long ago. Is it really? It is still about 65. I think most that's the kind of down the middle. Average person retires at age 65 in in America. I think that's a good one.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, so all right, let's go with 65. A sixty-five-year-old man has a 75% chance of reaching 75. Okay, that's pretty good. Okay. Half. Half this is where your median comes in, are gonna make 85. Which is pretty lengthy lifestyle. Life, I think. 10% are gonna make it to 95.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. It's optimistic. Yeah, you're right. And and but that's men.

SPEAKER_01

Now, women, of course, get a little bit better chance because again, back to my theory, women kill us off earlier so they can enjoy some time. So they can enjoy some time without us bugging them.

SPEAKER_00

I I can't blame them.

Withdrawal Rates Matter

SPEAKER_00

Uh so yeah, this okay, but going back to the beginning of all this, the survey, um, 30 years worth of income, that would I mean, you could everybody can run the number themselves, but that would be a lot of money saved. The the average, of course, is much, much. I can't even say enough um enough much to go as far down below that would be.

SPEAKER_01

Well, no, although if you use the 4% rule and you have a 50-50 portfolio, we've run lots of Monte Carlos, and the money tends to last. It does 30 years more and more. If invested. If invested, yes.

SPEAKER_00

Sequence of return. There's some ifs in there that can that can hamper uh what happens, but yeah, it it does kind of work. But here's the other part. More than half believe they can restrict where they find these people. More than half think they can take out 10% a year of their savings and things will work out. 10%. That's a pretty sizable increase from the forecast.

SPEAKER_01

Pretty sure, pretty sure that uh you've got to be making better than seven or eight percent on your money to make that last.

SPEAKER_00

That was a getting to that, right? Because there are those uh who are out there as financial commentators who say, Wait, as long as you're you're you're you're you're making more than you're taking off, and if you there's a one mutual fund that pays you twelve percent of your hands. You're talking Dave Ramsey. Ah, thank you. You broke the code there.

SPEAKER_01

Say it.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. They're gonna make it.

SPEAKER_01

And you know that's Ramsey with his silly, I don't know where I know where he got the number. He got the number from American funds, from a uh you know growth-oriented fund that had done 12 percent per year, but not over a hundred years because it didn't exist. We have a hard time finding anything that over a hundred years would have returned better than ten percent per year. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Well, not to pick on Mr. Ramsey, he does not sit across the table from any recent retirees or people been retired. He's just the the information comes from his mouth and goes out to the great uh all of us. And uh at the great unwashed, that's all I think I was not gonna say that. The thing is, it's different when you do this one-on-one and you have to talk to people through all of this. It's a that's a toy.

SPEAKER_01

And you have to face them when they're in their late 80s and they're out of money.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and or the market's gone down 40%, or what you know, whatever thing. So, anyway, going back to this, so yeah, 10%, that would be a very aggressive withdrawal strategy. And if you're one of the 10% that lives to your mid-90s, it probably will not work. No, uh, maybe your mid-70s, maybe, but 10% is a very aggressive amount. So, um, but this is this is all conjecture. This is all guessing. This is we don't know because we don't know the future, but more importantly, we don't know you. Every person, Don knows this, has their own withdrawal strategy. My withdrawal strategy is not to do it for a long time. Uh, and that's that compresses. I for a number of years, I'm not I'm not planning on it because I think I'll keep working if I can't, if you'll still have me on this wonderful program you've created here, and don't sub Roxy or somebody else in for me, as some people suggest. Uh I'll keep working. So I'm not gonna have to draw for a time. That's good. I I'm happy about that. But every individual or couple should have a plan, and you shouldn't be relying on guesswork or polls or anything else. That is an extremely dangerous way to handle your retirement.

Age Changes the Plan

SPEAKER_01

And uh the there also have to be a number of other factors that come into play, and and there's one of them that gets very, very little discussion. And that is if you start earlier, if you if you retire at 60 or 65, you're starting earlier, your money has to last a lot longer. So you really must be more conservative with your withdrawals.

SPEAKER_00

And I'm seeing that more and more, more and more people write me in their late 50s and say, I want to pull the pull the trigger.

SPEAKER_01

Well, if you pull the trigger then, though, it starts it starts becoming a little more dicey on even the four or the five percent rule, potentially if we have protracted downturns in the market, and that's where you have to become more conservative. Whereas those of us, and I'm looking at us, yeah, uh, who are waiting into their 70s before giving up some of work, probably not all of it, even then. Well, when we actually purely retire, we're gonna have a lot l a lot less life ahead of us. So we can afford to be a little more aggressive with our spending.

SPEAKER_00

It only follows. I can spend less because I won't need these fancy clothes, I won't need these nice ties all the time, right? I can just dress more Don McDonald-ish, if you will. Sir. Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

When was the last time you bought a new suit?

SPEAKER_00

I buy one tie now every year for retirement.

SPEAKER_01

And when was the last time you bought a new suit?

SPEAKER_00

No, clothing.

SPEAKER_01

Uh clothing expense. No. Uh let's see, biggest expense for you it's gonna say the house, but not. I'm going for vacations.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, it probably is. It probably is going for vacations.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, I think you're right. So you take some nice ass vacations.

Get Personalized Advice

SPEAKER_00

I do. I admit it. So, okay, but going back to just a withdrawal rate and people trying to figure this out. Number one, anybody, and I don't care if you've done any of the online calculators, they're out there, some are pretty good. Anybody should have a look by a professional. That's my advice anytime, and you can get it for very inexpensive, or in some cases, if you've really done all the legwork, probably nothing. But somebody should look that over. Number two, and this comes from Christine Benz, who I still love this quote the only correct withdrawal rate we know will be after you're dead. Then you'll know whether you took too much or too little, right? And and the the survey points out most people end up taking too little, which is a good thing.

SPEAKER_01

And here's the beauty of the the uh the flexible withdrawal rate. Even if it's a higher withdrawal rate, even if you take it up to like six, seven, eight percent per year. Flexible. Yep. That means in bad years you take less, and in great years you take a lot more. It's gonna be very hard to run out of money because you you're not drawing down much more than you're you're making on average over a long period of time, and it would take a protracted downturn in the market, which has never happened to that extent, to really hurt you. So your odds are pretty, pretty, pretty

Flexible Withdrawals Work

SPEAKER_01

good.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. Uh and let me mention a couple other mistakes I see. Um, this one happens a lot to people, especially it seems a lot of people start saving and then family stuff gets in the way, right? I got the kids, I got, et cetera, et cetera. And they don't know how much they should save. And you we've recommended many times 10 to 15% of your gross salary should be saved in some way. But that can be very difficult when you're in those formative years when you got a family, et cetera. But that's number one. The other one that I see almost every single time for people who are close to retirement, they don't know what rate of return they need on their money to sustain their portfolio. They don't know if it needs to be 7% or 10 or 12%, whatever it is. Uh you got to know that. And then the other one that I see on a very regular basis, in addition to that, is too much or too little risk. Most people are either taking a ton of risk, um, and I could go through the examples if you like, but you know who you are, or you've got it all stashed away in cash somewhere, waiting for whatever to happen in the world or the market, and it's not making really anything. So those are two few of the big problems I see as a practitioner every day.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, and uh again, it it has to be right for you. That's really the trick. And that's why we believe in everything being personalized. Even the the uh the stuff we talk about on the show, which is why we love your questions. We love it when you send us questions at talkingrealmoney.com on the ask a question button thing there that's on the screen. Just do that. Type it up, send it in. Uh Tom will read them on the show. Sometimes he'll even call you and talk about it with you. And uh you can also go there and record your question that is used during the Friday QA episode. But today, it's

Young Investor Portfolio

SPEAKER_01

summer, the quantity has declined slightly. So Tom has one very special type tree killing question.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and the good news is the trees are weaker now because they're getting thirsty, so things are drying out. So this is an easy time to cut them down, take advantage of the pulp making process. Uh so this comes from Anonymous. First name and last name, Anonymous Anonymous. Anonymous Anonymous. Yeah. But uh mentioned the city, Johns Creek, Georgia. I'm not which I'm not familiar with. Don't know it. I know Don's Creek, Georgia, because I've been there many times, but not Johns Creek, Georgia. Um, hi, Don and Tom. I would appreciate your advice regarding my 22-year-old son's current investment allocation and whether any changes would be appropriate for long-term growth. I'll say. He's accumulated savings from internship jobs, which is great, by the way. I was reading the uh market this year. Very tough on young people that are trying to get between school kind of jobs, not easy at all. Um, he recently graduated, will start a full-time job in September. Yay, that's really great. Here are current investments. He has a brokerage account of $10,000, and he has a Roth IRA of $18,500 in the brokerage. Wow. It's 80% uh DFAW and 20% VT.

SPEAKER_01

Hmm. Interesting. Okay.

SPEAKER_00

And then in the Roth, it is 25% DFAW. That's dimensionals. Equity, 25% VT, which is the Vanguard total uh global portfolio, and then 50%, so 25 DFAW, 25 VT, and 50% VTI, which I believe is the Vanguard International Fund, right?

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

Uh I always forget that they always mix that one up because it's got the I in it, and then I think so then I think it's international, and then somebody said, no, no, that's the No, I think that's the U.S.

SPEAKER_01

Let me just double check. Yeah, that's the U.S. I was pretty sure that was the U.S. So that's the U.S. So he's heavy U.S., heavier large cap U.S. Let me just finish the question.

SPEAKER_00

Says given his age and investment portfolio, would like to know whether this allocation is appropriate. If there's unnecessary overlap between these funds, I'll say. Whether adjustments could improve diversification or cost efficiency. Any can tax considerations between the brokerage and Roth recommend going strategy going forward for both accounts. So remember, 10,000 in the brokerage, 18,500 for the Rothschild.

SPEAKER_01

Again, are you not going to quibble? I will. No, don't quibble, really, because one, if you quibble, um he he mentioned expense ratios. So if you quibble, and I know the quibble you're gonna make, expense ratios are gonna go up fractionally. They're gonna go up a little. They are. Uh there is overlap, but but and he's overweighted in because of VT and VTI, U.S. large cap, of course. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

I'm just gonna quibble a bits. Is that okay? A bit. You can quibble a bit. Trevor Burrus, Jr. Quibble and bits, you get that. Anyway, um uh too many funds.

SPEAKER_01

For $28,000. Yeah. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

It's just it's a lot of work. Uh so and I mean you could just go with DFAW, period. That's what I'm saying. There's kind of a lot of overlap between DFAW and VT, right? Because those are both they both own the United States and and more.

SPEAKER_01

Um say The only thing you're doing is reducing your expense ratio a little bit.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, because VT is in the single digits, right?

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

DFAW is probably point twenty-four twenty-four, something like that. Um so you so yeah, um I personally, if it was my money, I'd have uh I here's you okay, you really want some diversification? Here you go. I would go A V G E in the brokerage account and DFAW in the Roth. How about that?

unknown

Okay.

SPEAKER_01

Two different companies. You're really diversifying.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, that's right.

SPEAKER_01

Between Avantis and Dimensional.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, because they both love me. Oh, I meant to get and we get nothing from them, okay? Just so you know.

SPEAKER_01

Oh, I know, but it sure sounds like we do, doesn't it? Uh no, we don't get anything.

SPEAKER_00

24, I was dead on. Yeah, you know. 24 basis points. So you so you're paying more, uh, and the hope is you're gonna make more, but you know, we don't know that heading forward.

SPEAKER_01

Well, historically, these asset classes have in the past made more. Oh, look, AVGE is only 23 basis points.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, two three. How about that? Yeah. So good for you.

SPEAKER_01

Saving the kid money. Yeah. Uh yeah, no, what a great start, though. Oh, I think it's fabulous. Yeah, eight thousand dollars in your twenties.

SPEAKER_00

Uh, if you did nothing more and just let that grow in a global portfolio and make ten percent a year, that's a lot of money by the time you're sixty-five. I think in you think in 40 years you should be able to retire at sixty.

SPEAKER_01

How old is he?

SPEAKER_00

22.

SPEAKER_01

22. No, let's say uh it's fifty, let's see, twenty-two.

SPEAKER_00

Forty five years. So sixty. I would say forty-five years. Yeah. So that's still a pretty hefty amount of um I I'd I'd personally think you're gonna probably have to wait till sixty-eight, sixty-nine in 40 years to retire, but that's my take.

SPEAKER_01

So I'm doing the math here. Let me just run the numbers here. Oh, you're gonna actually run the number. Over 45 years. Let's assume uh I'm gonna assume a 10% return. Which is historical, but one never knows. Um let's see. That's gonna be a mere uh two million dollars without adding anything.

SPEAKER_00

And after inflation, it'll be 47 cents. So that's still good because that'll buy you half a piece of gum.

SPEAKER_01

Listen to the differences. At 8 percent, it's I want Dave Ramsey, then sign me up, please. At 8 percent, it's less than a million. It's about 900,000. No.

SPEAKER_00

Okay.

SPEAKER_01

At 12 percent, it's 4.6 million. All right.

SPEAKER_00

I'm I'm I'm no offense to you because you know I care about you, but I'm gonna join the Ramsey bunch because 12 is You're going for the 12.

SPEAKER_01

Way more. That looks better. Plus, I get whatever you want to do. You're an old guy. We expect insanity out of you.

SPEAKER_00

I can get away with it.

Social Security Crunch

SPEAKER_01

So uh before we go, we have news that there's a send some news about when Social Security is gonna run out of money. I hate this because it also Well, not money, not all the money, just the trust fund, just the trust.

SPEAKER_00

So most of the money comes in and goes out the back door. Most. Right. But the trust, right now, if nothing is done, they just move.

SPEAKER_01

The trust is supplementing the benefits.

SPEAKER_00

Correct. And if they don't do anything, if they don't fix it anyway, uh, according to a new uh look by the trustees, it'll run out of money in late 2032, which by my calculation is about six years, just in time for me probably to need it.

SPEAKER_01

Let's do let's here's a little exercise for you. Because right now, Congress and the White House have really shown very little interest in finding a reasonable solution to the problem. And there are really only two solutions to this problem. Two solutions. Two. You only get the choice of two. No, that's one of the two.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, okay.

SPEAKER_01

One is raise taxes. Okay?

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, that's one. Again, let's describe what that is exactly. Hang on, let me give my two first.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, then you can my two for my kills. Raise taxes to reduce benefits. Those are the only two.

SPEAKER_00

There's a lot that fits in under both of those. Right, exactly.

SPEAKER_01

But but yeah, there are there are uh variations on those themes, but you gotta do one of the two or both of the two in one way or another.

SPEAKER_00

That's what's gonna end up happening. By the way, you made a great point when we talked about this before we did the program that people now being elected to the U.S. Senate will have to do something about this in this term.

SPEAKER_01

They will have to do it because they're in there for six years until 2032. Bingo.

SPEAKER_00

So they're gonna have to um so we're running out of time, in other words. And by the way, I still here's the reason I hate to bring this up because you've we've seen the numbers. More and people go file early when they hear this. They think I better get my money now because it's gonna go away. Right. But think about it just for a moment. The fact that half of people that are retired get the majority of their income from Social Security, right? That's 71 million people are dependent on this. Do you think they're gonna just let something like that go away? I mean, it's gonna say, oh, well, that was that was great while it lasted, but it's not gonna that is so unlikely. So unlikely. Even in politics, they can't make that one fly. So, Don, when he says raising taxes, okay, getting rid of the cap on social security, right now which is now 184,000, I think. If you make anything above that, then you don't pay into the system anymore. If you get rid of that, and it it that fixes it overnight. One, that's gone, that's over. But I personally think it'll be some combination of a slight change there, and probably hate to say it, people don't like it, and it's not gonna be as dramatic as it's been in other countries, but probably moving that 62 starter date maybe to 63 or 64. You gotta wait a little longer. Remember, this was set up in the 1930s, which is coming up on 100 years ago. People are living longer. System's not designed for people to be retired for uh 30 years at all. So probably have to wait a little longer to get your money. That's my guess. But who Yeah, I was right.

SPEAKER_01

It was $184,500. You're on it today. Um and so that means that every penny over that, you don't pay anything. Yeah. It's and you still pay in Medicare, but that's one of the easiest things to fix because all of us who earn slightly above 184 and we're in that group now. Yes, we are. For most of our life we were not in that group. That's true, too. But now we are. Uh, thankfully. I'm I'm I'm I'm very pleased. But the fact is, for most of the year I am used to seeing that taken out of my paycheck. I am used to living on the net income that I see every two weeks. In my paycheck. I'm used to seeing that.

SPEAKER_00

Taking out the seven point six.

SPEAKER_01

Now, when the fall comes and I have surpassed 184, I it's a windfall. That's not all you to take me to lunch. That's the same thing. I was living fine before. So, you know, psychologically, that may be the least painful of all of the options from a psychological standpoint because we already pay it. It's the easiest, it's the simplest. It's it's not from a messaging standpoint because it sounds like raising taxes, but it's just not reducing them at 184. That's my spin. I got a seat for you in the I mean there's no there's no cap on Medicare. Oh, by me by the way, Medicare is teetering on the brink, too. Um Medicare Well, but Medica it just means that those who are on Medicare will have to pay higher premiums. Period. That's just all that means.

SPEAKER_00

Yep. That's coming.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. So there's gotta be a solution. And folks, here's the thing. We know our audience. Yes, some of you are in your 20s and 30s, but you're not the majority, sorry. The majority are 50s, 60s, 70s. You guys, gals, old people, unite. You gotta pester your congresspeople. That's your members of the House of Representatives and your two senators in every state in the Union. They gotta do something, and they've gotta do something really soon.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, that's not very long from now. Here's the other thing that we need to pester the young people for. You gotta have more kids. You gotta have more kids. This is demographic.

SPEAKER_01

Or you've got to get better jobs. I'm sorry.

SPEAKER_00

Pay in more. This is demographic in a lot of ways because we're not replacing the population enough, so there's not enough people paying in.

unknown

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

That's part of the problem. There's another political issue hiding under all that, too.

SPEAKER_00

Fully aware of that, of course.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

unknown

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

We can't talk about sex on the program.

SPEAKER_01

No, I wasn't talking about sex. I was talking about immigration.

SPEAKER_00

Ah, yes. Well, gosh, don't go there, please, because I can't handle cards and letters anywhere.

SPEAKER_01

Well, no, I'm just saying that, you know, it's not. Shut it down.

SPEAKER_00

Yep.

SPEAKER_01

I know. I'm with you. We've got to have more people paying the tax somehow. I don't know how to do it. Unless we're going to just say, hey, China, give us more social oh wait, you don't pay any. Sorry.

unknown

Don't pay any.

SPEAKER_00

So no dice. Anyway, so we'll see how it plays out. But it's interesting, as you said, I think you made the best point of the day. People being elected to the U.S. Senate in this particular year will have to face this issue during their term. We'll see what happens.

SPEAKER_01

No choice. You gotta do it. Or AA the AARP crowd is gonna be mad. And by the way, the AARP crowd already believes. It's like it's only 40% who believe Social Security is gonna last.

SPEAKER_00

No, I think it's a small number. And by the way, speaking of that crowd, I was given a cane 35 years ago. I still have it, so I'll be prepared to use it. Not sugarcane either.

SPEAKER_01

So you'll be raising a cane?

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. And you can count on that too.

SPEAKER_01

Thank God I live 3,000 miles away from you. Your wife's gonna be embarrassed, not me.

SPEAKER_00

But it would not be the first time with that either. So we'll be okay

Questions and Help

SPEAKER_00

there.

SPEAKER_01

We uh hope you'll send us some questions because we'd have more of them if you did. Go to talkingrealmoney.com, click ask a question, type it in, speak it in. Those get answered on Fridays. And keep listening to the show. Give us your solution to selling printing.

SPEAKER_00

We'll take that too.

SPEAKER_01

If you have a solution, why not? I'll hear it.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, one.

SPEAKER_01

I'm telling you, there are only two.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. It's raise taxes or cut benefits.

SPEAKER_01

Raise taxes or cut benefits.

SPEAKER_00

I'd like to see.

SPEAKER_01

Or the two of them together. Do both.

SPEAKER_00

Sure.

SPEAKER_01

Anyway. And if you have a uh portfolio from which you would like to determine the best in way to the best way to get an income stream and the best income stream, yeah, you're pretty good with everything else. You just want a little help? Meet with one of our advisors. They're fiduciaries. They're not gonna charge you anything, they're not gonna pressure you to become a client, promise. They're just gonna help because everybody associated with this program really truly wants to help you be better with your money. And that's why we have for a very long time called this show Talking Real Money.

SPEAKER_02

The opinions and views expressed on this podcast were current on the date recorded. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, including any forward-looking estimates or statements which are based on certain expectations and assumptions. Although information and opinions given have been obtained from or based on sources believed to be reliable, no warranty or representation is made as to their correctness, completeness, or accuracy. Information presented on the podcast is not personalized investment advice from Oppello Wealth. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for everyone. This podcast does not identify all the risks, direct or indirect, or other considerations which might be material to you when entering any financial transaction. We hope you realize that the information provided on Talking Real Money is for informational, educational, and hopefully enjoyable purposes only. The podcast is not trying to get you to buy or sell any financial products or security. Instead, the program is provided as a public service by Apello Wealth, a fee-only registered investment advisor. Please see Appello Wealth's ADB Part 2A on our website for information regarding Appello's fees and services. Apello Capital, LLC DBA Appello Wealth, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in the states where it is properly registered or excluded or exempt from registration requirements. Registration with the SEC or any state securities authority does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Appello does not provide tax or legal advice, and nothing either stated or implied here should be inferred as providing such advice. Thanks for listening, and please visit TalkingRailMoney.com for more information and important disclosure related to performance of any specific index or fund quoted in this podcast. And the lawyers get richer.