March 2, 2026

More Qs reQuired

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player icon

On this Friday Q&A episode, Don answers listener questions on international stock overweighting inside a Seattle city retirement plan, whether a Vanguard target-date fund might be a smarter emotional guardrail than self-managing allocations, how much term life insurance a family really needs (hint: it’s about replacing income, not funding Ivy League dreams), whether an aggressively small-value–tilted Avantis portfolio is too risky for a disabled early retiree, and how to evaluate a $36,000 pension annuity versus a $500,000 lump sum using withdrawal math instead of Monte Carlo optimism. The recurring theme: feelings aren’t an edge, discipline beats prediction, and structure matters more than conviction.

0:09 Fewer recorded questions lately and how to submit them

1:41 Seattle city employee overweighted in international stocks

3:36 Why “historic pivots” and gut feelings aren’t an investing edge

4:50 Target-date fund vs. self-built allocation

7:27 Using small-cap/value funds alongside a target-date fund

9:15 Risk tolerance vs. emotional market timing

10:53 How much term life insurance is enough?

12:35 Replacing income vs. funding lifestyle extras

12:44 Aggressive Avantis (AVGV/AVGE/AVNV/DFAW) portfolio review

15:50 What happens if your portfolio drops 50%?

17:10 Pension choice: $36k annuity vs. $500k lump sum

21:29 The 41-year math on the lump-sum difference

22:52 Why lump sum often makes you the “insurance company”
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Questions? Comments? Click!